Performance
Indicators
BACK TO RESULTS
-
q
Ref :-
Minimum Standards of Practice in the Treatment of Enuresis, Dr Roger
Morgan, Penny Dobson (Ed). Published by Enuresis Resource
& Information Centre, 1993. Revised and
reprinted 1996.
Principles |
|
Is The
Service ?
|
Accessible to
people it is designed to serve
Socially acceptable
Relevant to population needs
Consistency in its standards
|
Working
Definitions
|
Severity
50% or more wet nights in two weeks
Initial Success
Achieving 14 consecutive dry nights within 16 week
treatment period.
Effectiveness
average number of weeks taken to reach initial criteria
of success.
Lack of Success
Failure to meet initial criteria of success, excluding
drop outs.
Dropouts
After initial appointment, 2 consecutive appointments are
missed without notice.
OR
Treatment discontinued by agreement with parents, child
or doctor.
Relapse
More than two wet nights in two weeks
Continued Success
No relapse in the six months after initial success
Complete Success
No relapse in the two years after initial success
|
|
Minimum Standard
|
Target Standard
|
Cambridge Practice
|
Catchment
Area
|
Specify geographic area
|
Establish area in conjunction with existing services.
|
No geographic area specified.
Service open to all.
64% come from local areas, within 1 or 2 postcodes, 80 %
within 3 postcodes & 90 % - 4 postcodes.
|
Publicising the Service
|
To GPs, paediatricians, urologists, medical officers,
psychiatrists, psychologists, school nurses, M&CHN, Continence Advisors.
Include what service is for, nature of service and
referral criteria and methods.
|
As per minimum, but circulate annually.
Display in public places - libraries, health centres,
schools, local voluntary organisations.
|
Service is promoted to GPs and all Paediatric service
providers in region.
Information includes service description, accessibility, referral
requirements and costs involved.
|
Who Will
be Served
|
Not influenced by race, gender, culture, social class,
religious back ground, nationality or care status.
State priorities in accepting referrals
|
Special facilities for those with English as second
language.
Facilities for learning difficulties/physical
disabilities
|
No discriminations made.
Majority % of fee rebated by Medicare.
Special needs children accommodated : Cambridge already has helped children
with sensory-neural deafness, autism and developmental delay.
|
Appointments
|
Pre appointment information should
be provided regarding service policies, options available and out comes
which could occur.
No one to wait greater than 1 month
between referral received and appointment made.
No one to wait greater than 3 months
between referral and first appointment.
See patient within 30 minutes of
appointment time.
Report outcome to referrers.
|
Not wait greater than 2 weeks.
Not greater than 1 month.
Within 15 minutes.
|
Information regarding service,
referral, costs and program detail given at telephone appointment and if
required an initial information kit posted with further details.
Appointments offered at time of
referral (telephone)
Patient seen within 2 weeks (avg 2.0
weeks)
Patients seen on time, 79% "always
on time"
19% "often on time"
Close contact with referring GPs via
letter at initial consultation, at discharge and any relevant events eg:
relapse.
|
Consent to Research
|
Explanation, information and
informed consent from parent of research undertaken or experimentation.
|
|
No specific research at present but
continual audit.Private practice - difficult to
research.
|
Referral to Other Services
|
On referral to other agencies if
daytime wetting or encopresis.
Treatment practitioners to have
broad understanding of complimentary managements eg: homoeopathy /acupuncture.
|
|
Cambridge provides services for all
continence problems both urine and bowel.
Occasionally on referral for radiology and rarely paediatric surgery.
Paediatrician has introduction to laser accupuncture
|
|
Minimum Standard
|
Target Standard
|
Cambridge Practice
|
Assessment
|
History obtained of problems,
family/environment, prior treatment, prior investigation, child and family
attitudes to treatment.
2 week base line assessment.
Treatment plan agreed with child and
family.
|
As per minimum but include options
for management plan.
Detail management plan, charting
progress.
|
Full history and examination and
necessary investigations undertaken.
Full explanation to child and
parents with management option discussed.
Plan formalised and personalised
manual given to parent/child for information and ongoing management /
communication.
|
Management
|
Treatments based on adequate
research documenting effectiveness. Management effectiveness should be
monitored.
Treatment should be acceptable to
child and parents and be described.
|
Range of treatments should be
discussed.
|
All management options discussed and
based on accepted and effective practice (Cambridge current initial success
80% - intention to treat)
|
Explanation and Information about Methods
|
Treatment procedures and equipment
should be explained at a level suitable to age and understanding of child
and adult.
|
Written information, visual aids
given and explain.
|
Complimentary to management manual
full education and discussion with the child and parents. Visual aides
used. Initial assessment / management of 1½ hrs duration.
Education re-enforced at each
meeting.
All staff
paediatric trained.
|
Alarm Based Managements
|
Bell and pad and mini alarm.
Comply with safety standards.
Replace after 7 years.
Break down rate less than 1 in 5
treatments cycles.
Replace faults within 2 weeks.
Logging system re alarm use and
return.
|
Other booster types or alternative
alarms available.
New detector for each new patient,
service each 2 years.
Replace after 5 years.
Break down rate less than 10%.
Replace fault within 1 week.
Alarm loss rate less than 10%.
|
Bell and pad and body worn alarms
used. Some vibratory alarms for hearing impaired.
All comply with Australian safety
standards.
All checked and maintained after
each use and during treatment as necessary.
Break down rate for body worn alarm
17% (complete break down).
Immediate replacement of any problem
alarms / battery replacement.
All alarms logged for use by hirer,
return date, returned, non returns noted. One lost to date.
|
Medications
|
Treatment used appropriate and
review 1 weeks after use. Monthly review if children
|
|
Medications only used on
consultation with parents primarily as interval management until success
achieved with alarms (eg school camps).
Rarely for daytime wetting.
Reviewed by telephone 2-3 days, then in 2 weeks and each 2-3 weeks.
|
|
Minimum Standard
|
Target Standard
|
Cambridge Practice
|
Follow Up
|
Within 1 week of start of treatment
Follow up every 3 weeks.
Offer 1 appointment for each failed
to attend. (FTA)
A facility to seek and receive
advice between appointments.
|
Within 1 weeks of starting treatment
Follow up maintained at 2 weekly
intervals.
Facility within 24 hours.
|
Follow-up in clinic each 2 - 3
weeks. Telephone contact on day after first night.
Telephone, letters or E-mail each
week.
FTA's offered further appts up to 2
FTA's.
FTA Rate 2.7% of consultations.
Alarms replaced / repaired in
working hours, some delivered after hours to parents home.
After hours number given with usually immediate contact.
|
Drop Outs
|
Not greater than 25% of starting
treatment.
Apply follow up system to avoid
losing contact with patients.
|
Not greater than 15%
|
Drop out rate 2.0
Fail to attend 2.7%
All current patients on running
sheet kept by Continence Nurse Advisors. All Files remain in "Active" file
system until discharge, reviewed monthly.
|
Relapses
|
Successful treatment followed up by
telephone/letter at a minimum 6 months and offer treatment if relapse.
|
Follow up to 12 months.
|
All patients follow up at 6 months
and 24 months by letter and telephone.
All offered appointments if relapse.
|
Monitoring and Evaluation
|
Performance of Individual child.
All treatment monitored to record
wet/dry nights.
Feed back from users.
Routine evaluation of degree of
satisfaction of treatment and actions taken to improve.
Record kept of all complaints and
action taken appropriately.
|
Also monitor progress indicators,
frequency, size of wet patch, time alarm goes off.
Regular sharing with parents /
child.
Analyse data annually and summary of
data provided to referrers.
|
Progress monitored by wets per
nights, patch size, self awakening, time of wetting/alarm, and dry and wet
nights.
Bowel problems / soiling also
monitored as appropriate.
Client satisfaction surveys sent to
all.
Date collated each month and trends
followed.
Data available to referring
practitioners and public via Internet site and to referring practitioners yearly via
mail.
|
|
Minimum Standard
|
Target Standard
|
Cambridge Practice
|
Effectiveness of Service
|
Outcome Data
Based on Butler's working
definitions.
Process Data
Gathering data on performance
indicators. Based on service delivery.
Clinical performance Indicator
Best is
Single Effectiveness Ratio.
(initial success as % of all
entering treatment).
Action taken if Service in decline.
|
Data available to referral sources,
child and family, esp. success and relapse rates
Devise clinical plan to improve
results
Single effectiveness ratio at least
50%.
|
Outcome data collected / collated /
analysed each month.
Results published on Internet, to
child and parent in manual, and to referring practitioners each year.
Performance indicator data collated
and analysed monthly and published as above.
Single effectiveness ratio by Butler
criteria 80%. (ie intention to treat)
Standards being maintained.
|
Staff Training, Supervision and Support
|
All staff trained in treatment
methods used.
Staff have regular performance
appraisal.
Staff to have access to regular
sources of updating and support from colleagues.
|
|
Staff meetings - informal/ad hock,
formal each 3 months.
Training programs yearly to second
yearly.
Discussion re recent literature.
Paediatrician attends public
hospital continence clinic as visiting paediatrician
|
Termination of Treatment
|
No termination on any grounds other
than decision of child and parent.
Valued clinical appraisal of lack of
effectiveness or unsuitability for child/adult.
Other circumstances outside control
of advisors.
Not terminated after an arbitrary
time limit, through shortage of resources or need for other patients.
|
No patient has had treatment
terminated other than by patient's wishes and discussion with advisors.
|
Last Updated Wednesday, 21. February 2007
|